🔗 Share this article

Turns out the manager could survive defeat by Grimsby. He weathered losing a crucial continental showpiece against one of the worst Tottenham teams for many years. He withstood home defeats to West Ham and Wolves, finishing 15th, the tactical inflexibility, undermining the team's most promising homegrown talent, a poor winning percentage, calling the squad the worst the club has ever seen. Yet, there existed a single opponent with whom Ruben Amorim was not permitted to tango. If you challenge the sporting director, you had better succeed.

Unfortunately, like many a top-flight defender during Blackburn Rovers' title-winning campaign, the coach took on Jason Wilcox and appears to have failed. The most casual observer can see the irony here: a coach who frequently berated his squad for failing in one-on-one duels succumbing when confronted by the white heat and animal charisma of one of the Premier League’s most intimidating sporting directors.

And frankly, this entire bruising episode appears to portray the director in a whole new light. Perhaps it might have been tempting, based on his brief stint of experience at Southampton, to view Jason Wilcox as little more than a functionary in the United exoskeleton: an individual who owed his position largely to his close relationship with ex-colleague Omar Berrada as any demonstrable skill. How wrong we all were. In brilliantly outsmarting the club's celebrated manager, as he outmanoeuvred the unfortunate a previous executive before him, Jason Wilcox has demonstrated to be among football's true generals: a strategic mind that United’s competitors will now be rightly wary.

A Tactical Clash Regarding Formation & Philosophy

To illustrate, this was Jason Wilcox , after having been part of the leadership that hired the 3-4-3 fundamentalist the coach in the first place, played a key role in trying to persuade Amorim to abandon his beloved 3-4-3. Unsurprisingly, these entreaties faced pushback. However, these judgements hold greater authority when issued by a man with the impeccable football pedigree of Jason Wilcox, holder of three England caps and a role in a championship team decades past.

Perhaps in time he may be persuaded to explain his reasoning publicly. Maybe one day questions may arise why Amorim is walking away with a full payout, without any penalty clause in place. The director seldom speaks in public, for excellent reasons. The true intellectuals in football – men like him – function at a level exceeding our prosaic understanding. Were he to speak, probably we would perceive is a series of high-frequency signals and four-dimensional whirring. Wanting is not equivalent to being ready to comprehend it.

The Supreme Power Behind the Throne

Naturally, by focusing our attention on the sporting director we are obscuring the true genius behind the modern United throne. Jason Wilcox is, in reality, simply carrying out the commands of his ultimate superior Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who privately has emphasized his desire for a four-man defense. According to reports, the owner has also suggested deploying the forward as a right wing-back. Ratcliffe is keen for United to embrace data science and analytics. According to ESPN, during a leadership summit early in his investment, he announced that United’s style to football “will be decided in this room”.

After all, Sir Jim is a specialist in this technical footballing stuff, drawing from his previous experience in petrochemicals and yachting. Most importantly he is immensely wealthy, and it is known, the rich are the best of us: more perceptive, sagacious, strategically brilliant, simply better. Whom else could one trust to oversee a strategic plan of austerity, the building of a new stadium that looks a lot like an abstract design, the acquisition of a new striker?

A New Soccer Hierarchy: Executives Above Managers

This represents a shift that is becoming prevalent at the elite levels football. Historically, clubs foolishly delegated major sporting choices to low-level employees such as coaches, talent spotters – even footballers. Maybe previously possible for a young, innovative manager with a philosophy and drive to go into an organization and implement their plan supported to fruition. Yet how many businesses have such individuals set up? What number of large-scale layoffs have they managed? Better by far to place genuine authority where it rightly belongs: the executive class, the open-necked shirt brigade, the guys with the jaw-dropping LinkedIn profiles. It is wiser to determine the tactics in the boardroom and appoint a coach who will adapt their methods accordingly. If coaches were formerly chefs, they are now more akin to delivery personnel: not really responsible for the food, but still finally accountable should it be delivered cold or leaks out to meet standards.

In the meantime, their job has become less about defining the vision and more about selling it: the receptionist of the operation, the public face of an organisation they can do little to change. A coach at Chelsea leads a team of very young players into the Champions League and secures two medium-sized trophies, and effectively gets sacked for talking. A manager at Celtic sees his reputation ruined whereas the people who appointed him continue to make errors indefinitely.

A Modern Corporate Game: Accountability Only for the Few

And perhaps in a small way this represents corporate governance at work: the elevation of a gilded overclass who can never be wrong, whose choices are always untouchable, whose errors can always be resolved by sacking without explanation. Hire the system coach and then dismiss him for playing excessively that system. Bring in the project manager and then bin him for requiring too long. And above all show gratitude; for your modest season ticket price rises, for the latest player acquisitions, for the reality that the adults – regardless of their expertise – remain in control.